Mojave Experiment Q and A
MiCCAS.net Logo

Other MiCCAS Sites

Mojave Experiment Q and A

Oct 2nd 2008

For those who were after more information on the Mojave Experiment (both those whom e-mailed me, and well.. didn’t), here is some further information obtained from Microsoft about the experiment.

Q: What is the “Mojave Experiment?”

The Mojave Experiment is a focus group project Microsoft conducted recently to better understand the reactions of
customers to seeing Windows Vista - when they were not actually aware that it was Windows Vista. Microsoft
interviewed and polled 140* participants in San Francisco, testing users’ preference for and perceptions about
Windows Vista, under the pretence that it is a new operating system code-named “Windows Mojave.”
Duration: The focus group took place over three days in San Francisco during the month of July.
Subjects: Over 140 computer users (Mac, Linux, Windows XP and Windows 2000), chosen from the focus group
organizer’s database, called at random, but then selected based on having a low perception of Windows Vista
(<5 rating on a scale of 1-10).

Demo: A trained retail salesperson gave a ten-minute demo of key Windows Vista features, geared by the
interests and direction of the participant.

Hardware: Demoers used an HP Pavilion dv2000 Entertainment Notebook PC series with 2GB RAM, running an
Intel Core 2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz. The OS was a 32 bit version of Windows Vista Ultimate.

We think the results are quite interesting. See below or, better yet, see them for yourself at
www.MojaveExperiment.com.

*Includes both 120 videotaped and 20 non-videotaped participants

“Mojave Experiment” Participant Responses:

1. Of the 140* respondents polled (on a scale of 1:10 where 10 was the highest rating):
Before they saw the demo, the average rating for Windows Vista was 4.4.
After they saw the demo, the average rating for the “new OS” code-named Windows “Mojave” was 8.5.

2. After seeing the “new OS” code-named Windows “Mojave” demo:
94% of respondents rated the “new OS” code-named Windows “Mojave” higher than they initially rated

Windows Vista before the demo.
0% of respondents rated the “new OS” code-named Windows “Mojave” lower than they initially rated

Windows Vista before the demo.

*Includes both 120 videotaped and 20 non-videotaped participants

Types of Computer Users participating in the “Mojave Experiment:”*

  • ? 84% Windows XP Users
  • ? 22% Apple OS Users
  • ? 14% Pre-Windows XP Users
  • ? 1% Linux Users

*Some users use multiple platforms

Q: Why only a 10-minute demo? Why not let users try on their own? Doesn’t the “downside” of the product reveal itself after days and weeks, not 10 minutes?

Actually, customers who own and use Windows Vista are very happy with the product. In a recent independent
survey conducted by Penn, Schoen and Berland Associates, we discovered that 89%* of existing Windows Vista
users in the US say that they are satisfied with the product, and that 83%** of Windows Vista Users are likely to
recommend a Windows Vista-based computer to their friends or family who are looking to buy a new computer.

With the “Mojave Experiment,” on the other hand, we set out to challenge preconceptions about Windows Vista
with people who had only heard about it but never tried it. We wanted to challenge conventional wisdom about
product quality and value, and find out if, once users’ preconceptions were no longer a factor, how would they feel
about the look, feel and features of Windows Vista? The results surprised even us - 94% of respondents rated the
“new OS” code-named Windows “Mojave” higher than they rated Windows Vista before the demo. But again, you
should judge for yourself: www.mojaveexperiment.com

*Includes very (43%) and somewhat (46%) satisfied
**Includes very (46%) and somewhat (37%) likely

Q: How did you conduct the demo?

Focus group respondents (Mac, Linux, Windows XP and Windows 2000 users) were chosen from the focus group
organizer’s database, called at random, but then selected based on having a low perception of Windows Vista (<5
rating on a scale of 1-10). We brought respondents into a research facility, where a trained retail salesperson
provided a 10-minute demo of Windows Vista, under the pretense that it is a “new OS” code-named “Windows
Mojave.” The salespeople presented key Windows Vista features, geared by the interests and direction of the
participant.

Q: What PC was used?

Demoers used an HP Pavilion dv2000 Entertainment Notebook PC series with 2GB RAM and 120GB hard drive,

running an Intel Core 2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz. The OS was a 32 bit version of Windows Vista Ultimate. We did not geek out, customize or provide any optimization of the system before the demo - we explicitly chose a typical PC that a customer would see at retail these days.

Q: Ok, but was there something special about the demo?

No, it’s the same type of demo someone would get if they walked into a retail outlet and talked to a salesperson about buying a Windows Vista PC. We didn’t add new applications or strip applications out, or do anything that would cause the experience in the Mojave focus group to vary from the experience of buying at retail.

Q: Was the focus group rigged? Were the installation, hardware, conditions or set of tasks “optimized”?

A: We didn’t do anything special with the PC or the software running on it - we didn’t add any new applications or

strip applications out. We didn’t optimize test conditions or make anything in the focus group unique to the standard experience of shopping for a new Windows Vista PC at retail. If you visited any US retail outlet, you’d find the
computer we used to be mid-range (in terms of price and capabilities) and the demo to be consistent with one you might get from an ordinary retail salesperson.

Q: Did Microsoft pay the participants?

A: Microsoft worked with an independent research firm to select the participants and conduct the Mojave

Experiment and followed standard industry practices which include paying each participant nominal fee for their time and effort.

Q: The Mojave Experiment involved 120 recorded participants, but the Web site only shows 55 people - what did the other 65 people think? Did Microsoft edit the videos to make the reaction in favor of Windows Vista?

A: We chose to display videos of people talking about different aspects of the features and functionality that were
interesting and not too repetitive. The videos you are seeing are a representative sample of the people we spoke
with. In fact, 94% of participants rated “Windows Mojave” higher than Windows Vista and none gave it lower
scores, indicating the consistency we got from the perception testing. Needless to say, there were a lot of consistent reactions across focus group participants and we felt that a representative sample would tell the “Mojave
Experiment” story best.

As part of the process, we also asked the focus group participants if they would be willing for us to share videos of them with you all. We did not get permission from all focus group participants and, therefore, are respecting their wishes by not using clips from their interviews.

The overall data from the testing is provided on the website:

? Average pre-demo score for Windows Vista was 4.4; average post demo score for the “new operating
system” codenamed Windows Mojave was 8.5

? 94% of participants rated the “new operating system” codenamed Windows Mojave higher than they
initially rated Windows Vista; no participants gave it a lower score than Windows Vista

Q: Now that the Mojave experiment has already been conducted and the results communicated publicly in

coverage and on the web, don’t you think you’ve lost the element of surprise? Or How can you continue to do these experiments when the element of surprise has been eliminated?

A: Despite the success of Vista already, there are still a lot of folks who haven’t yet gotten a chance to decide for themselves. Clearly, we think that just about anyone who hasn’t tried Vista yet will likely come away with a more positive view of Vista and therefore can decide for themselves if they like to switch fulltime to it. It will be a nice problem to have when we can’t find any more non-Vista users out there to supply our focus groups J

Q: Why didn’t you have people install Windows Vista on existing XP machines? Why didn’t you include any “power users” in the focus group?

A: We explicitly set out to survey traditional consumers who use computers and had heard about Windows Vista but had never actually seen it. Most power users have used Windows Vista, and virtually all have seen it. The fact is 99% of traditional consumers buy PCs at retail with operating systems pre-installed. Having users upgrade existing
machines wouldn’t be consistent with the experience of the vast majority of consumers.

Q: Why didn’t you let people take PCs home and use it for a few days? Isn’t it true Windows Vista reveals problems that users encounter over days and months, rather than 10 minutes?

A: We actually already know what people think when they take new PCs home and use for a few days or even longer.
9 out of 10 of them are either satisfied or very satisfied. We didn’t need to do another market test to confirm that.

The point of the Mojave Experiment is to challenge preconceived notions about Windows Vista among people who
had never even seen the product. We provide a quick glimpse of the product in hopes they (and lots of others in group 3 above) would then go and spend some time with the product, and decide for themselves if Windows Vista is better than what they may have previously heard or read.

We’re betting that the more time people spend the product, the more they will like it. This has been the case with almost all Windows Vista customers so far - our research indicates nearly 90percent of current Windows Vista users are either satisfied or very satisfied with Windows Vista, and that their satisfaction levels are increasing over time. That said, we understand the near-term pain customers experienced after launch. SP1 and other Windows Updates improved reliability, performance and usability, and we have worked hard with ISVs, device manufacturers and PC manufacturers to fix incompatibilities to improve the customer experience - from the moment they first power up on through the entire lifespan of their Windows Vista PCs.

Q: If 89% of customers are satisfied with Windows Vista, doesn’t that mean 11% aren’t satisfied?

A: No, some users are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied. And according to surveys of more recent PC purchasers, the satisfaction rate has actually climbed to 92%.

Q: Is this in response to Apple’s Mac vs. PC campaign?

A: No, the Mojave Experiment is part of Microsoft’s investment in engaging consumers on the value of Windows Vista and to make people who have never seen the product to give it a shot.


Windows Live Messenger Wave 3 Beta Released to Public

Sep 18th 2008

Sure, you use Messenger to send instant messages, but did you know you can also make phone calls, video calls*, play games, and exchange pictures too?

Download: http://g.live.com/1rebeta3/en/wlsetup-all.exe


Windows Live Messenger / MSN Down

Sep 11th 2008

Numerous users are reporting that the Windows Live Messenger server is currently down, and not accepting any authentication requests. For those who are already signed in, you can remain using the service as required.

Users also reported earlier issues today, including messenger logging in and out, and users randomly appearing offline.

At this stage the Windows Live Server page is saying all servers are fine, like usual - however, this is highly doubtable. No news from Microsoft just yet, however we will let you know as soon as the service is back up.


Google Releases New Web Browser – Google Chrome

Sep 10th 2008

Google have entered the web browser market by releasing their new web browser, namely Chrome.

The Google Chrome browser has been designed from the ground up to provide a new browser, designed for today (rather than for the original release of the internet; as claimed by Google). The browser includes many features found in other released browsers, with claims of speed and simplicity.

For more information, visit www.google.com/chrome/

image


Hewlett Packard creates notebook with 24 hour battery

Sep 10th 2008

According to a post made on APCMag.com, HP “has upped the ante by designing a machine with a purported 24-hour battery run time”.

Hewlett Packard claim they have been able to create a 24 hour notebook by including an ultra-high capacity battery in their EliteBook 6930p, and newly-released Intel X25-M solid-state drives and LED displays. This release comes just after Dell’s 19-hour notebook release, with the HP machine being released in October 2008.


Copyright 2008 Michael Casha
Hosted by Servers Australia